by: kigray
Total views: 1
Word Count: 546

On March 14th, Bear Stearns, the fifth-largest investment bank in the United States, entered a period of insolvency. As growing lack of confidence in the firm's subprime exposure grew, other banks eventually refused to lend to the stricken company, which has existed for over 85 years. Were Bear Stearns a commercial bank, (i.e. institutions that loan money to people or businesses) it would be able to, as a last resort, take advantage of the Federal Reserve's so-called "discount window," thus receiving a government loan at the lowest available interest rate. The reasoning behind making loans to private businesses is sound, because overall confidence in banks is much stronger. But for equally obvious reasons, the discount window cannot by definition extend to institutions that take on risk as their business because they have less or no accountability to taxpayers. However, after Bear Stearns seemed on the brink of collapse, everything changed. Bear Stearns shares began to falter as investors took flight. The Federal Reserve took decisive action to save the beleaguered bank by guaranteeing a $30 billion loan to their biggest competitor, JPMorgan Chase, so they could buy BS without fear of acquiring more dangerous subprime mortgage-related debt. In effect the government has now bought a troubled investment bank for pennies on the dollar, (their first offer was $2 a share, when BS traded at a high of $170 a year ago) knowing that taxpayers might have to foot the entire bill themselves. At the same time, the Bush administration has maintained that no government bailouts would extend to the financial sector. Moreover, wealthy BS shareholders balked so much at the firesale of their investments that the Fed, under pressure from potential litigation, increased the bid for BS by five times, to $10 a share. This means that, while the potential losses will be felt by millions of taxpayers (many of whom are in danger of losing their homes to foreclosure), while profits will most certainly be reaped by the corporate executives at JPMorgan. Even with its exceptional exposure to subprime securities, BS is still worth well over a billion dollars. Profit-taking was the name of the game on the heels of the announcement, as day traders bought up huge amounts of BS stock at $2 or $3 a share and sold after the bid increased. By taking responsibility for the BS takeover, the Fed has changed the course of America's financial future. By guaranteeing the discount rate to BS, they implicitly must be able to do so for other investment banks in trouble in the future, which implies continued taxpayer absorption of Wall Street failures without any corresponding kickback from banks. Unless the Fed intend to rein in on banks more as the economy struggles through the recession, this policy clearly demonstrates a dramatically different view of finance than the Federal Reserve of 1913, when there was a real discount window you could use to keep your bank alive. Now, it seems, the most secure economically secure institutions are those most separated from average American lives. Politicians who recognize the increasing resonance of populist messages in the present climate are sure to turn this takeover into a major issue.

About the Author

Ki helps buyers interested in Austin real estate http://www.escapesomewhere.com his website has a free search of the Austin MLS http://www.escapesomewhere.com/realestate_searchthemls.html along with updates on his Austin real estate blog http://www.escapesomewhere.com/austinblog/

---

View PDF | Print View

---

Rating: Not yet rated

--Choose-- 0 1 2 3 4 5

Comments

No comments posted.

Add Comment

You do not have permission to comment. If you log in, you may be able to comment.
Next Article - When Starting A Business, The Choice Of Account Is Essential
Previous Article - I've Lost My Banking Job and I'm now a Debtor

More Related Articles In This Category

1: Offshore Bank Account is a Must for Many Individuals
2: In One Hand And Out The Other
3: Long Term Savers Are Latest Victims In Bank Squeeze
4: How To Survive The Financial Drought
5: Interest Rate Determination Three Key Factors
6: The Risks Of Using ATMs When Out Shopping
7: Identity Theft and How You Can Recover
8: The Benefits of Online Banking and Investment
9: Unsecured Loans Your Solution to an Improved Credit Score
10: How A Business Account Is A Crucial Element In The Success Of Your Company
11: Advice For Those Starting A Small Business
12: Choosing A Bank For Your Assurance
13: Why A Business Rather Than A Personal Account Is More Advisable
14: The Banking World Is Changing
15: Why Your Credit Card Interest Rate Is Important
16: Choosing The Right Credit Cards For Your Use
17: Get What You Need Right Now With Credit Cards
18: When Starting A Business, The Choice Of Account Is Essential
19: Bear Stearns and the New Federal Reserve
20: I've Lost My Banking Job and I'm now a Debtor
21: Bear Stearns and the Free Market
22: Bear Stearns from 20 Billion to 236 Million and Beyond
23: Panama To Benefit From EU Crackdown On Offshore Tax Havens
24: Factors To Consider When Choosing A Business Account
25: Northern Rock - How A Problem Became a Disaster

---

For WebMasters

Link This Article - HTML Code -

<a href="http://americanahost.com/articles/finance/banking/bear-stearns-and-the-new-federal-reserve.html" target=_blank>Bear Stearns and the New Federal Reserve</a>

Link This Article - BBcode -

[url=http://americanahost.com/articles/finance/banking/bear-stearns-and-the-new-federal-reserve.html]Bear Stearns and the New Federal Reserve[/url]

Copy This HTML Code To Put This Article In Your Web Site.

<h1>Bear Stearns and the New Federal Reserve</h1><br><br> <br><br> On March 14th, Bear Stearns, the fifth-largest investment bank in the United States, entered a period of insolvency. As growing lack of confidence in the firm's subprime exposure grew, other banks eventually refused to lend to the stricken company, which has existed for over 85 years. Were Bear Stearns a commercial bank, (i.e. institutions that loan money to people or businesses) it would be able to, as a last resort, take advantage of the Federal Reserve's so-called "discount window," thus receiving a government loan at the lowest available interest rate. The reasoning behind making loans to private businesses is sound, because overall confidence in banks is much stronger. But for equally obvious reasons, the discount window cannot by definition extend to institutions that take on risk as their business because they have less or no accountability to taxpayers. However, after Bear Stearns seemed on the brink of collapse, everything changed. Bear Stearns shares began to falter as investors took flight. The Federal Reserve took decisive action to save the beleaguered bank by guaranteeing a $30 billion loan to their biggest competitor, JPMorgan Chase, so they could buy BS without fear of acquiring more dangerous subprime mortgage-related debt. In effect the government has now bought a troubled investment bank for pennies on the dollar, (their first offer was $2 a share, when BS traded at a high of $170 a year ago) knowing that taxpayers might have to foot the entire bill themselves. At the same time, the Bush administration has maintained that no government bailouts would extend to the financial sector. Moreover, wealthy BS shareholders balked so much at the firesale of their investments that the Fed, under pressure from potential litigation, increased the bid for BS by five times, to $10 a share. This means that, while the potential losses will be felt by millions of taxpayers (many of whom are in danger of losing their homes to foreclosure), while profits will most certainly be reaped by the corporate executives at JPMorgan. Even with its exceptional exposure to subprime securities, BS is still worth well over a billion dollars. Profit-taking was the name of the game on the heels of the announcement, as day traders bought up huge amounts of BS stock at $2 or $3 a share and sold after the bid increased. By taking responsibility for the BS takeover, the Fed has changed the course of America's financial future. By guaranteeing the discount rate to BS, they implicitly must be able to do so for other investment banks in trouble in the future, which implies continued taxpayer absorption of Wall Street failures without any corresponding kickback from banks. Unless the Fed intend to rein in on banks more as the economy struggles through the recession, this policy clearly demonstrates a dramatically different view of finance than the Federal Reserve of 1913, when there was a real discount window you could use to keep your bank alive. Now, it seems, the most secure economically secure institutions are those most separated from average American lives. Politicians who recognize the increasing resonance of populist messages in the present climate are sure to turn this takeover into a major issue.<br><br> <h3>About The Author</h3> Ki helps buyers interested in Austin real estate http://www.escapesomewhere.com his website has a free search of the Austin MLS http://www.escapesomewhere.com/realestate_searchthemls.html along with updates on his Austin real estate blog http://www.escapesomewhere.com/austinblog/<br><br> Keywords: <b>bear stearns,fed,federal reserve,jpmorgan,bailout,economy,subprime,mortgage,credit,liquidity,crisis</b> <br><br>Article Source : <a href="http://americanahost.com/articles"><b>Articles Directory</b></a></br> Article URL : <a href="http://americanahost.com/articles/finance/banking/bear-stearns-and-the-new-federal-reserve.html" target=_blank>Bear Stearns and the New Federal Reserve</a></br> Article Category : <a href="http://americanahost.com/articles/finance/banking/">Banking</a></br> Article Author : <a href="http://americanahost.com/articles/profile/kigray-286.html">kigray</a>

---

Article URL : Bear Stearns and the New Federal Reserve
Article Category : Banking
Article Author : kigray