by: msdodger
Total views: 1
Word Count: 433

Is there any specific experience that can best prepare an individual to be the President of the United States? Service in the military? Running a business? Governing a state? Or will the much maligned legislative experience suffice? How much of the right sort of experience is enough? Consider the resumes of two of our best presidents. Consider first Mr. Lincoln. When Lincoln came to office he had served a number of terms in the Illinois state legislature, only one term in the House of Representatives, had limited military service, and his sole executive experience was as postmaster of a small rural hamlet. Lincoln's resume has to be, if not the thinnest of anyone elected to the Presidency, one of the thinnest. Consider next Mr. Truman. A failed businessman, a county commissioner then a senator for less than two terms before becoming vice president and ascending to the Presidency by virtue of Mr. Roosevelt's death. His military career, while exemplary, was also short. Any executive experience? To the extent that you can call the Vice Presidency an executive position, he had about all of a couple of months. Truman and Lincoln are on most historians' short list of great chief executives. And yet two thinner resumes would be hard to find. So should the electorate always reject the candidate with less experience in favor of the one with more experience? Using this criterion Douglas should have been selected over Lincoln and Roosevelt should have kept Henry Wallace as Vice President. Fortunately in both these cases the more experienced candidate did not prevail. Bill Clinton said earlier in this primary season that electing Barrack Obama would be rolling the dice, taking a gamble with our future. Given the lack luster performance of many of out better qualified former presidents, this is apparently precisely what many of us our willing to do. Jimmy Carter had a splendid resume: a successful farmer, a governor and a naval officer. On the republican side Herbert Hoover also had a good resume: an accomplished mining engineer, a successful administrator of a massive food relief program in Europe and a cabinet officer. Both Hoover and Carter have become, perhaps unfairly, the poster children of failed presidencies. Voters know that the quality of leadership is often completely unrelated to the extent of experience. Voters are gravitating to Mr. Obama, despite his inexperience, because they sense that he has the leadership skills that other more experienced candidates lack. Our history has given us at least two good "precedents" for making just such a choice.

About the Author

Michael Sack Elmaleh is a Certified Public Accountant and Certified Valuation Analyst. His book, "Financial Accounting: A Mercifully Brief Introduction", has received wide critical acclaim. He has nearly 30 years of accounting and teaching experience. http://www.understand-accounting.net

---

View PDF | Print View

---

Rating: Not yet rated

--Choose-- 0 1 2 3 4 5

Comments

No comments posted.

Add Comment

You do not have permission to comment. If you log in, you may be able to comment.
Next Article - Panama, A Political Overview
Previous Article - Now Who Was It That Said, Washington Is Broken?

More Related Articles In This Category

1: What Next For Bahrain?
2: What Has France's New President Done For The Country
3: Did Obama's Arrogance Trump His Intelligence?
4: Is Traditional Politics Dead?
5: Rush Limbaugh's Operation Chaos: The Ninja Option?
6: Healthy Lifestyles, Cartoons, Elmer, Bugs - President Fudd, Bugs bin Ladin Is Not Here, Go Home!
7: Healthy Lifestyles, Global Kerosene From Airplanes - Time For Cleaner Super Train!
8: Healthy Lifestyles, Wise Aging - No More Patents, but A Nobel Peace Prize
9: Presidential Facts and Fun Trivia
10: Use This Political Ad And You Have My Vote
11: Texas Primary Reveals Republican Unease Over McCain
12: Panama, A Political Overview
13: What Sort of Experience is Needed to be a Good President?
14: Now Who Was It That Said, Washington Is Broken?
15: Texas Primary May Decide Democratic Party Nominee
16: Antique History, American Thoreau - Inspired Gandhi How to Free India
17: National Health Care Reform Will Determine the Next President of the United States
18: Do Blogs Dynamically Transform the Modern American Political Culture
19: Mr. Bin Laden: Tear this Wall Down
20: Delta Force to New Orleans
21: What Does It Really Mean To Be A U.S. Citizen?
22: Can Democracies Work And Do They Make A Difference To Ordinary Lives?
23: Power Polling: How to Win Elections and Customers
24: The Demos Year End 2008 Campaign Review: Obama Up, Clintons Tank, and John Out
25: What Every Politician Should Know About Campaign Signs

---

For WebMasters

Link This Article - HTML Code -

<a href="http://americanahost.com/articles/Politics/what-sort-of-experience-is-needed-to-be-a-good-president.html" target=_blank>What Sort of Experience is Needed to be a Good President?</a>

Link This Article - BBcode -

[url=http://americanahost.com/articles/Politics/what-sort-of-experience-is-needed-to-be-a-good-president.html]What Sort of Experience is Needed to be a Good President?[/url]

Copy This HTML Code To Put This Article In Your Web Site.

<h1>What Sort of Experience is Needed to be a Good President?</h1><br><br> <br><br> Is there any specific experience that can best prepare an individual to be the President of the United States? Service in the military? Running a business? Governing a state? Or will the much maligned legislative experience suffice? How much of the right sort of experience is enough? Consider the resumes of two of our best presidents. Consider first Mr. Lincoln. When Lincoln came to office he had served a number of terms in the Illinois state legislature, only one term in the House of Representatives, had limited military service, and his sole executive experience was as postmaster of a small rural hamlet. Lincoln's resume has to be, if not the thinnest of anyone elected to the Presidency, one of the thinnest. Consider next Mr. Truman. A failed businessman, a county commissioner then a senator for less than two terms before becoming vice president and ascending to the Presidency by virtue of Mr. Roosevelt's death. His military career, while exemplary, was also short. Any executive experience? To the extent that you can call the Vice Presidency an executive position, he had about all of a couple of months. Truman and Lincoln are on most historians' short list of great chief executives. And yet two thinner resumes would be hard to find. So should the electorate always reject the candidate with less experience in favor of the one with more experience? Using this criterion Douglas should have been selected over Lincoln and Roosevelt should have kept Henry Wallace as Vice President. Fortunately in both these cases the more experienced candidate did not prevail. Bill Clinton said earlier in this primary season that electing Barrack Obama would be rolling the dice, taking a gamble with our future. Given the lack luster performance of many of out better qualified former presidents, this is apparently precisely what many of us our willing to do. Jimmy Carter had a splendid resume: a successful farmer, a governor and a naval officer. On the republican side Herbert Hoover also had a good resume: an accomplished mining engineer, a successful administrator of a massive food relief program in Europe and a cabinet officer. Both Hoover and Carter have become, perhaps unfairly, the poster children of failed presidencies. Voters know that the quality of leadership is often completely unrelated to the extent of experience. Voters are gravitating to Mr. Obama, despite his inexperience, because they sense that he has the leadership skills that other more experienced candidates lack. Our history has given us at least two good "precedents" for making just such a choice.<br><br> <h3>About The Author</h3> Michael Sack Elmaleh is a Certified Public Accountant and Certified Valuation Analyst. His book, "Financial Accounting: A Mercifully Brief Introduction", has received wide critical acclaim. He has nearly 30 years of accounting and teaching experience. http://www.understand-accounting.net<br><br> Keywords: <b>The Presidency, relevent experience, Lincoln, Truman, Clinton, Obama</b> <br><br>Article Source : <a href="http://americanahost.com/articles"><b>Articles Directory</b></a></br> Article URL : <a href="http://americanahost.com/articles/Politics/what-sort-of-experience-is-needed-to-be-a-good-president.html" target=_blank>What Sort of Experience is Needed to be a Good President?</a></br> Article Category : <a href="http://americanahost.com/articles/Politics/">Politics</a></br> Article Author : <a href="http://americanahost.com/articles/profile/msdodger-200.html">msdodger</a>

---

Article URL : What Sort of Experience is Needed to be a Good President?
Article Category : Politics
Article Author : msdodger